Monday, April 22, 2013

Earthquake in China: News & Relief

[Content Note: Dying injuries.]On Saturday, there is a devastating earthquake in China's Sichuan province, that has left a minimum of 189 people dead and 1000's hurt. So many people are still missing. A lot more than 17,000 individuals have lost their houses.Aid and save teams have battled to locate children and supply help though 2,000 aftershocks which have cluttered streets with debris and triggered landslides, making many streets unpassable via vehicle.Here's some suggested reading through:CBS News: Over 189 Dead in China Earthquake: "We Lost Everything." [CN: There's a picture of the hurt survivor in the link.]Protector: China Earthquake: Experience Couldn't Save Individuals Not Fast Enough or Not Big Enough.Aljazeera: China Faces Fresh Crisis in Quake-Hit Sichuan.New You are able to Occasions: Making it through China's Latest Earthquake, but Afraid to visit Home. BBC: Save Teams Blast Streets Among Aftershocks.Yahoo News: What Triggered the Deadly China Earthquake?I'm getting trouble finding reliable information about where and just how to best help, although it appears as though Oxfam Sichuan and something Foundation could be good options. For those who have any suggestion about where you can direct teaspoons, please leave them in comments.This quake is comes 5 years following the quake in Sichuan which left 90,000 people dead or missing. I do not have words to share how profoundly sad I'm for anyone in this area, who're battling with the aftermath of some other devastating natural disaster so right after the final one.I understand you will find Shakers who've family in this area: I really hope your family are secure.

Sunday, April 21, 2013

Programming Note

I have not had an opportunity to watch either Parks & Rec or Elementary yet. I'll watch them over the past weekend, and I'll publish the threads on Monday.ETA. There is no new episode of Elementary last evening, anyway. NEVERMIND! But there have been two instances of Parks & Rec. So: Individuals.

Saturday, April 20, 2013

Garbage Treasures: Now With More Ed Hardy!

Since you may recall, Deeky collects and saves useless garbage like we are beyond Thunderdome and useless garbage has become a kind of currency and he's a garbageaire. Then, rather than tossing it away, he throws bits of his fancy detritus collection into an envelope and pays money to ship it in my experience, after which I insert them in plastic treasure chests and set them by the curb each week to become collected through the "treasure guy," who buries them in the "treasure dump" for me personally for safe keeping.Although not before you take an image from the bounty to ensure that I'm able to publish it, natch.[Click to embiggen.]Counter-clockwise from top left: The packaging itself, a shiny vibrant red-colored envelope having a sparkly sticker of the tween boy who I'm able to only assume is part of One Direction some useful educational materials written by John Stossel a pamphlet on "How you can Pray the Rosary," that will clearly are available in very helpful a "Growing Pains" buying and selling card featuring "Jeremy Burns as Ben Seaver" a burned copy from the conservative film Last Ounce of Courage which Deeks has handwritten Clearly a burned copy from the Sean Penn film This Should Be the area (that we CANNOT WAIT To Look At) which Deeks has handwritten Obviously a burned copy of (things i am speculating may be the remake of) Red-colored Beginning (that we can't wait not to WATCH) which Deeks has handwritten NO DOY along with a packet of orange-flavored Erectile dysfunction Sturdy Energy Stays: "All Day Long Energy 3-Pack. Pour on tongue."LOL FOREVER.

Friday, April 19, 2013

Tweet of the Day

Tweet during the day: British is my native language. My words mean things i intend. Should you read them in a different way due to "social context" that's your condition.Or Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) April 18, 2013It's most likely an overall total coincidence that people had this exchange yesterday: You may not n't get the social context that you are earning your remarks? @richarddawkins— Ana Mardoll (@anamardoll) April 17, 2013

Thursday, April 18, 2013

An Observation

Two findings, really:1. I'm glad each and every moment of each day that Mitt Romney isn't the US leader. However I am especially glad now.2. Last evening, because the news from the explosion in Texas broke, I figured about Leader Obama needing to understand this news. (And That I thought about that person who needed to function as the someone to simply tell him.) Lots of USians feel totally overcome right now—scared and sad and angry and psychologically spent. And That I cannot think of the weight of the on our Leader. I'm delivering him what strength I'm able to offer.Within the late hrs from the evening, watching grainy footage of triage inside a football area where greater than a hundred people needed medical assistance, because the latest from Boston and updates about ricin-laced letters and quotes from parents of Newtown sufferers perplexed and disappointed and furious concerning the Senate's failure to enact the most fundamental gun reform scrolled along the foot of the screen, I texted Jess: "I simply seem like the entire country needs care. Everybody requiring it everybody feeling empty. Exactly how should we fill one another support when we are all running on emotional fumes? ...We want a national group hug. With Leader Obama in the centre. Which image just helped me cry. I'm a mess lol."And that is virtually where I stand. And That I understand that aching from afar is really a comparative luxury.

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Richard Dawkins Remains Deliberately Ignorant

[Content Note: Hostility to Reproductive Privileges, IVF] I am just likely to leave these here. (As screenshots since the Twitter embed is acting funky right now.) Thinking in unfamiliar ways is among the things academics do. If you do not like this, hesitate before following an academic on Twitter (Link.)As D Barash stated, if your certain edible berry had strong contraceptive impact on our forefathers, we'd be phobic about this as though poison (Link.)If our Pleistocene forefathers had easy birth control, would natural selection have destabilized sex lust at the fee for lust to provide birth? (Link.)I possibly could explain this type of thinking only is sensible should you assume without evidence that early humans treasured a "reproduce constantly, whenever possible" paradigm, instead of -- as numerous humans have demonstrably done at many occasions throughout history -- seeking an account balance between volume of birthed children in addition to quality of upbringing to ensure that the kids may survive to their adult years and accrue the required abilities to outlive as grown ups lengthy enough to reside their very own lives, parent their very own children, and make their very own communities. Which these "reproduce constantly" humans which allegedly been around are thus (again, without evidence) our transformative forefathers instead of their early human alternatives who produced in a lower rate but nurtured their offspring better to make sure a greater rate of survival.  I possibly could also explain that there's pointless to visualize without evidence that early humans did not face exactly the same concerns concerning the balance between adult companies able to obtaining assets and child customers not capable of fending on their own that people still face today and which still drives a lot of us to consider reproductive methods apart from "bear all of the children", which early humans did not therefore devise their very own reproductive methods designed to deal with these challenges to be able to ensure their very own survival within the moment instead of some type of "lengthy-game" proper make an effort to position themselves because the forefathers of individuals on Twitter around 2013 A.D.  I possibly could furthermore explain that the idea of birth control isn't a modern one dating back to we've historic records to exhibit, humans happen to be deeply worried about controlling their reproduction. Abortions aren't a brand new factor hormonal techniques of contraception aren't something totally new barrier techniques of contraception aren't something totally new rhythm techniques of contraception aren't something totally new reproductive abstinence isn't a new factor. I possibly could explain how foolish it's to visualize these techniques only arrived to style with the presence of historic records, which everybody who been around pre-historic tracks simply felt completely in a different way about the significance of reproductive control than many of their descendents did. (However their attitudes toward porn were clearly passed down for their Twitter descendents.)I possibly could possibly explain that presuming our forefathers were stupid -- so stupid that they couldn't note expected outcomes and would rather suspiciously treat a hormonal contraception berry as "poison" -- is a very common error among those who have selected with other our forefathers as essentially inferior privately, which this error is generally rife among (for instance) religionists seeking to assert the Bible should be divinely inspired because how else could a lot of backwards pre-historic fools observe that individuals need to have their bloodstream in their physiques if they would like to survive? And That I could explain that Richard Dawkins, like a professional atheist, would probably have experienced this exact same attract the supposed profound lack of knowledge in our forefathers.However I will rather explain only this: I'm absolutely amused at Dawkins' claim that he's an "academic" which therefore he thinks in "unfamiliar ways" to his inferiors on Twitter.Richard Dawkins, your thought process is not unfamiliar in my experience, it's contemptible. I only say this since you still deliberately decide to remain completely ignorant of the things that you opine on as if they're simply cutesy little brain-teaser games despite the fact that you can easily research these subjects and even though you realize for several that the ignorant opinings on contraception and IVF -- that you simply still trollishly repeat for attention and debate -- negatively modify the lives from the women (yet others with uteri) who are around you, once we daily find it difficult to conserve a hang on our to control our very own reproduction. Please all of us a big favor and shut the fuck up. Should you absolutely must spout evo-psych bullshit, grab a hairbrush and The American Idol Show that shit to your bathroom mirror. You will get less Twitter drama from it, but a minimum of you will still have your preferred audience.

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Quote of the Day

[Content Note: Fight against agency.]"Closing its doorways would—as the condition appears to concede within this argument—force Mississippi women to depart Mississippi to acquire a legal abortion... [This] would create a patchwork system where constitutional privileges can be found in some states although not others."—US District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III, in the opinion after stretching a brief injunction which prevents Mississippi from closing the Jackson Women's Health Organization, the final abortion clinic within the condition, "because it attempts to enter into compliance having a 2012 law needing all doctors who perform abortions in the clinic to possess acknowledging rights at local hospitals. The injunction was extended before the constitutionality from the law can be established inside a current pending suit from the condition. To date, no hospital within 30 miles from the clinic grants acknowledging rights to the doctors."It's a temporary reprieve, but an important ruling.

Monday, April 15, 2013

RIP Republican Celebrity Task Force

Aww, the Republican Celebrity Task Pressure is not going to take place. Sadface.The Republican National Committee is meeting now within the most touristy a part of Tinseltown, but it is apparent the "Celebrity Task Pressure" suggested by last month's "autopsy" report is not going to take place.The suggested task pressure was probably the most mocked of 219 suggestions from the five-member committee assigned with considering why the party worked out so poorly this year.InchThe Party is viewed as old and detached from popular culture," the audience stated. "Establish an RNC Celebrity Task Pressure of personas within the entertainment industry for hosting occasions for that RNC and permit contributor to sign up in entertainment occasions in an effort to attract more youthful voters."...There's a made the decision insufficient star energy in the committee's four-day spring meeting regardless of the locale. Still, the schedule nevertheless searched for to take advantage of the Hollywood setting. The 168 people were built with a dinner reception Thursday evening in the Rupert Murdoch-controlled Fox Galleries. Their guest loudspeakers were a California condition assemblywoman, popular talk radio host Hugh Hewitt and former Repetition. Allen West (R-Fla.)."Oblivion," the brand new sci-fi film starring Tom Cruise and Morgan Freeman, opened Wednesday in a theater next to your accommodation hosting the meeting.Ripley's "Surprisingly" museum and also the Hollywood Wax Museum are nearby, too. Multiple party leaders joked – anonymously – that individuals are metaphors for that condition from the party.LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!

Saturday, April 13, 2013

Quote of the Day

[Content Note: Disablism privilege gender essentialism othering.]"That's insane. I am talking about this meal here's like $2 an individual so I'm not sure where they are getting (that from). I only say I love honey, like raw honey, along with a jar is $25, however it can last for 2 yrs. So that they were just being sensationalist. There's lots of inches of column that individuals have to fill and lots of occasions they simply attempt to get noticed and say stuff that aren't true, regrettably. ...For instance, I love to use organic chicken, but it is more expensive—you do not have to.Inch—Gwyneth Paltrow, protecting herself against charges it would cost around $300/day to consume foods prepared from quality recipes in her own new cook book.The amount is definitely overinflated, since the periodic price of whole jar of honey or perhaps a whole bag of the niche make of gluten-free flour are made in to the estimations for any single recipe. Therefore it is most likely nearer to, say, $100/day.Which clearly many of us can totes afford. And, otherwise, just change to the standard chicken. (Despite the fact that within the book she's marketing, she creates: "I'm a firm believer in raising creatures right and eating only organic, heritage, grass-given, free-range ones—or better still, game wild birds in the wild, the actual way it was intended to be." Admirable, truly. Also not something everybody are able to afford, when they even get access to ethically-elevated meat.)Request your preferred fishmonger for other suggestions regarding how to cut costs!Anyhow. You will find certainly individuals who write bullshit for attention or page hits or whatthefuckever, but you will find additionally a hell of many people who've written serious and thoughtful criticisms of Paltrow's apparently unaware privilege baked into her GOOP lifestyle garbage. And, you realize, even just in a shitty economy, there's still lots of space for luxury brands because you will find still lots of people with a lot of money. But the one thing that people (myself incorporated) are objecting is the fact that Paltrow positions her brand as accessible, not aspirational. * * *Consequently, her new cook book can also be peppered (see things i did there?) with a few super experience about gender roles:On meat: "Gwyneth eats zero red-colored meat and Julia eats a small bit in some places, but both of us frequently allow it to be for some individuals within our lives (mostly males...)."With an egg whitened omelet: "This is exactly what to create each morning in case your boyfriend is really a bodybuilder. Or else you want him to appear like one. We've got the concept to partly whip the egg-whites from the Jean-Georges Vongerichten recipe."...On men's needs: "I do not eat red-colored meat, but may a guy requires a steak."And lastly, this excellent little bit of othering: "Seafood sauce could be frightening, it's a lot flavor. Which explains why I really like it." Yes. Seafood sauce, a kitchen staple in literally vast amounts of houses globally, is frightening. Good grief.

Friday, April 12, 2013

Discussion Thread: Sit or Stand?

[Content Note: Scatological humor.]So, last evening, Iain and Kenny Blogginz and that i were chilling out, and that we experienced the truly amazing Caregivers versus. Standers debate. Have no idea exactly what the Great Caregivers versus. Standers debate is? Well, allow me to place it candidly: It is a debate about sitting or standing to wipe the sofa after pooping.I'm a sitter. Iain is really a stander. And that we (passionately!) mock one another about our particular options constantly.It had been my impression that standing is rare. Iain contended that standing was accepted I thought. So, obviously I needed to research it (seriously, a lot uproarious laughter throughout this whole factor), and that i learned that Iain was right! This (amazing, amusing) Metafilter thread reviews: In April of 2007, College Humor carried out a casual poll of the readership's (ahem) wiping habits. This month [12 ,. 2009], Came Magary re-examines the outcomes of this "study" for Deadspin, and involves exactly the same shocking conclusions. (Note: These links contain bathroom-related discussions that individuals with increased delicate sensibilities most likely will not enjoy.)When carried out with their business the bathroom, about 50% of those you realize wipe their heinies standing, contributing to 50% of those you realize get it done seated. In addition, many report being completely not aware the other option is available. So the debate continues.LOL FOREVER.Used to do note, however, that College Humor and Deadspin have disproportionately male audiences, and so i wondered in the event that skewed the (informal) results. "I will possess a discussion thread relating to this on Shakesville, so more women can weigh in!" I declared.So here i am.Are you currently a sitter or perhaps a stander?[Of course, no judgment of other individuals options, please!]

Monday, April 8, 2013

Happy Birthday, Space Cowboy!

Happy Birthday, Space Cowboy! You're this type of dear friend in my experience, and also to Iain. We like you. I am so glad I made individuals note cards.And, despite the fact that not everybody realizes it, this complete community is with debt for you for the tech work you have done behind the curtain through the years. Thanks. You rock aloud.(P.S. Space Cowboy will most likely 't be acknowledging these birthday wishes today, while he does something SUPERFUN for his birthday. But don't allow that to prevent you! He'll discover their whereabouts eventually!)

Sunday, April 7, 2013

More

[I initially released this in May 2009, and reposted it once in May 2010. As there exists a large amount of new visitors lately, a number of whom don't feel obliged to concern themselves using the needed reading through, I believed it was time for you to repost it. Also? Since I require it around other people.]This, you might have observed, is a website on teaspoons.It's a blog about batches of measurement so infinitesimally small they weren't given names, about glitches within the Matrix so quick and subtle that they're easier skipped than observed, about tangible contaminants of the factor known as progress not visible towards the human eye alone.It's a blog about hope—not the type that's packed and offered in anti-aging creams, pop cans, or perhaps political campaigns—but the actual factor: A hopefulness that radiates like whoa in the pores of indefatigably positive dreamers, who close their eyes and tilt their faces up toward the sun's rays and picture the next where equality and freedom aren't aspirational concepts, but determining options that come with every human existence.It's a blog about connection, and also the realization that we're all within this factor together, and also the resolve to become all in, because we really make a difference nowadays, permanently or ill, because we all know there's no neutral there's no moral ambiguity in remaining quiet there's only standing and saying no thanks towards the indignities one human visits upon another, or tallying.It's a blog of extremely uncommon anticipation, because uncommon anticipation would be the seed products of progress.Among the finest American advocates for progress, a gentleman you might have heard about named Dr. King, isn't appreciated for giving an address about his resignation to things as they are. He's appreciated while he admonished us to not wallow within the valley of despair and exhorted us to picture large things and told us never to be happy with less. He stated around the world, "I've got a dream," which dream was what lots of people may have contacted it is time (and could call still) an uncommon expectation.Eliminating any type of bigotry is, obviously, an uncommon expectation—because institutional bigotry is deeply established. Prejudice is ancient. Merely a fool would imagine it may be overcome.Except, obviously, that it may be. Piece by piece. Particle by particle. Teaspoon by teaspoon. Person by person. Prejudice is ancient, however it dies using its every company and should be trained again. Also it can be unlearned. Piece by piece. Particle by particle. Teaspoon by teaspoon. Person by person. Persistence, it requires, and determined sanguinity, to produce people full of expansive love and intractable respect for each other inside a culture that casts us as opponents. Also it takes uncommon anticipation, the seed products of progress.Thus, each time someone asks me, greets my bellicose display of uncommon anticipation with, the exceedingly not-progressive question, "Exactly what do you anticipate?Inch I'll answer just like I usually do: I expect more.Obviously the Republican Party is racist. Exactly what do you anticipate?I expect more.Obviously plenty of male writers are misogynists. Exactly what do you anticipate?I expect more.Obviously some tv program is homophobic. Exactly what do you anticipate?I expect more.Obviously some feminists are transphobic. Exactly what do you anticipate?I expect more.Obviously you will find ablest jokes in sitcoms. Exactly what do you anticipate?I expect more.Obviously you will find body fat-disliking jokes in ads. Exactly what do you anticipate?I expect more.You cannot expect individuals to wreck havoc on legendary cultural images simply to provide a jerk to diversity. It'll upset people.The fuck I can not. I expect more.I am not ironically detached, I am not apathetic, I am not resigned, and I am not contemptuous of bleeding hearts. I'm a greedy bitch with voracious anticipation, and that i dream lengthy and lustfully of the better world that's both my muse and objective. I would like it such as the cracked earth from the desert wants rain, and that i will neither apologize for nor amend my desire due to its remove in the present its distance encourages my achieve.Think before asking me things i expect.You know the solution.

Saturday, April 6, 2013

More

[I initially released this in May 2009, and reposted it once in May 2010. As there exists a large amount of new visitors lately, a number of whom don't feel obliged to concern themselves using the needed reading through, I believed it was time for you to repost it. Also? Since I require it around other people.]This, you might have observed, is a website on teaspoons.It's a blog about batches of measurement so infinitesimally small they weren't given names, about glitches within the Matrix so quick and subtle that they're easier skipped than observed, about tangible contaminants of the factor known as progress not visible towards the human eye alone.It's a blog about hope—not the type that's packed and offered in anti-aging creams, pop cans, or perhaps political campaigns—but the actual factor: A hopefulness that radiates like whoa in the pores of indefatigably positive dreamers, who close their eyes and tilt their faces up toward the sun's rays and picture the next where equality and freedom aren't aspirational concepts, but determining options that come with every human existence.It's a blog about connection, and also the realization that we're all within this factor together, and also the resolve to become all in, because we really make a difference nowadays, permanently or ill, because we all know there's no neutral there's no moral ambiguity in remaining quiet there's only standing and saying no thanks towards the indignities one human visits upon another, or tallying.It's a blog of extremely uncommon anticipation, because uncommon anticipation would be the seed products of progress.Among the finest American advocates for progress, a gentleman you might have heard about named Dr. King, isn't appreciated for giving an address about his resignation to things as they are. He's appreciated while he admonished us to not wallow within the valley of despair and exhorted us to picture large things and told us never to be happy with less. He stated around the world, "I've got a dream," which dream was what lots of people may have contacted it is time (and could call still) an uncommon expectation.Eliminating any type of bigotry is, obviously, an uncommon expectation—because institutional bigotry is deeply established. Prejudice is ancient. Merely a fool would imagine it may be overcome.Except, obviously, that it may be. Piece by piece. Particle by particle. Teaspoon by teaspoon. Person by person. Prejudice is ancient, however it dies using its every company and should be trained again. Also it can be unlearned. Piece by piece. Particle by particle. Teaspoon by teaspoon. Person by person. Persistence, it requires, and determined sanguinity, to produce people full of expansive love and intractable respect for each other inside a culture that casts us as opponents. Also it takes uncommon anticipation, the seed products of progress.Thus, each time someone asks me, greets my bellicose display of uncommon anticipation with, the exceedingly not-progressive question, "Exactly what do you anticipate?Inch I'll answer just like I usually do: I expect more.Obviously the Republican Party is racist. Exactly what do you anticipate?I expect more.Obviously plenty of male writers are misogynists. Exactly what do you anticipate?I expect more.Obviously some tv program is homophobic. Exactly what do you anticipate?I expect more.Obviously some feminists are transphobic. Exactly what do you anticipate?I expect more.Obviously you will find ablest jokes in sitcoms. Exactly what do you anticipate?I expect more.Obviously you will find body fat-disliking jokes in ads. Exactly what do you anticipate?I expect more.You cannot expect individuals to wreck havoc on legendary cultural images simply to provide a jerk to diversity. It'll upset people.The fuck I can not. I expect more.I am not ironically detached, I am not apathetic, I am not resigned, and I am not contemptuous of bleeding hearts. I'm a greedy bitch with voracious anticipation, and that i dream lengthy and lustfully of the better world that's both my muse and objective. I would like it such as the cracked earth from the desert wants rain, and that i will neither apologize for nor amend my desire due to its remove in the present its distance encourages my achieve.Think before asking me things i expect.You know the solution.

Friday, April 5, 2013

Late Night, Bourbon Street

by Shaker BrianWS, who might be a full-time contributor at some point, based on numerous mysterious factors which i cannot reveal without tearing apart the world at its very seams. Sorry![Content Note: Misogyny hostility to consent harassment.]I visited New Orleans the very first time a week ago for any business travel. It had been my very first time there, also it really was awesome to determine areas of New Orleans I'd only seen before on tv. The initial culture from the town is incredible and sophisticated, but that's an entire other publish. What I am covering today could, and does, happen in several places.I had been on Bourbon Street one evening, my second time in a bar having a house band so excellent I needed to return. I had been having a work friend, another whitened guy, and that we were contacted with a roving bartenders, a youthful whitened lady. She'd contacted us the prior evening, too, on occasions making some sexually suggestive moves using the test-tube shots she was hawking.Jovially, I designed a joke towards the effect of, "I am talking about, you are really adorable, but you are totally woofing in the wrong tree here!"She place the test tubes in the tray, chuckled, and leaned to let me know, "I am just doing the things that work!InchI simply checked out her for any second as my brain processed that admission, and she or he continued, saying, "The men on Bourbon St. expect some thing. They do not simply want a shot—even whether it's in the lovliest lady in here. They would like to hug you or touch you or cause you to do individuals types of things if they are thinking about buying one of your stuff.InchI informed her, "That's so fucking gross. I am so sorry."And she or he stated, "I understand, but I have had a 3-year-old daughter, and that i get $24 for each tray of those shots I sell, and also the more I actually do that, the faster they're going. That's the only goal in my experience.InchShe was around for any couple of minutes and talked within the excellent house band. Throughout that conversation, the job persona she needed to affect to earn a living fell away. The lady I had been now talking with had a completely different demeanor—the self-protective mask had fallen away and here only agreed to be an individual attempting to pay the bills. She was kind. She was funny. She was candid around. She did not owe us that, but she offered it anyway. And That I really loved the individual she tell me, a bit, for the reason that noisy bar.What stored echoing within my mind were her words, "the men on Bourbon St. expect some thing,Inch and that i understood it wasn't just here on Bourbon St. that males "expected some thing.InchBut it is the incorrect type of expecting more.Inside a culture that routinely objectifies women, as well as in which each and every little bit of casual misogyny aims to strengthen the concept that just as being a lady is not enough, the men on Bourbon St. needed more. Plus they felt titled into it. They believed titled to demand use of a ladies body when they were going to buy, something which clearly would not be an expected area of the purchase were it a guy selling the merchandise.That is the issue. When the wisest, most effective women are routinely told what related to their physiques with a patriarchal and misogynist culture (Stop running for that Whitened House now! Now run for that Whitened House!), it leaves someone like our roving bartenders nothing more than two options.She will grudgingly offer something more—a touch, a hug, use of her body—and become unattainable her tray of products to males who're only interested in the manner her performance will surprise them, as opposed to the goods she's really selling, or she will won't pander to some neighborhood culture (present in many communities) where misogyny rules, sell less products, and go back home with less cash to consider proper care of her daughter, to consider proper care of herself, to supply food and shelter.She find the former, and that i could hear in her own voice the way in which she'd resigned herself to doing something she did not wish to accomplish, however the only factor that mattered to her was getting enough money in the finish from the evening, the finish each week, the finish from the month, to consider proper care of the most crucial part of her existence. I left the bar angry that evening. Angry away from the option she'd made, but in the options she'd been offered—the options which are produced by males inside a culture which has trained them in a lot of ways in which a ladies is not her very own, but something intended for their satisfaction. Angry the distinction between earning money and never earning money for the reason that atmosphere all came lower as to whether she was prepared to stroke the egos of drunk males, and suggestively accompany their groping, their touching, their requirements, all within the title of promoting alcohol.I do not begrudge her the option she made. And That I don't judge her for which makes it.I'm angry that they was handed no truly significant choice to begin with.[Related Reading through: Why I am Professional-Choice, and My Boyfriend Is, Too.]

Thursday, April 4, 2013

Whooooooooooops!

[Content Note: Kyriarchy.]This is amusing whether it were not so terrible:How are whitened male managers doing if this involves diversity? Great! A minimum of that is what the whitened male managers stated inside a recent survey.Exactly what do the non-whitened, non-male managers think? Less upbeat....Requested to rate the variety effectiveness among whitened male leaders within their companies, 45 percent of whitened males gave an optimistic rating. Among ladies and people of color, only 21 percent agreed. Wide gaps were also based in the thought of whitened men's capabilities to teach and enhance the performance of diverse employees (33 points difference) build strong, diverse teams (36 points) promote diverse talent on merit (36 points) and can include diverse voices in making decisions (40 points.)That's a a significant disparity!The framework from the disparity within this piece is quite amazing, too:But based on the study, it isn't entirely the responsibility of whitened male managers. What we should have here, it claims, is failure to speak....[Whitened male leaders] do great if this involves being sincere, laptop computer stated, but are unsuccessful if this involves saying the things they think. A lot of fear that any critique or discussion of race or gender will probably have them in danger, so that they cure it entirely.' ' that's certainly my knowledge about ten years of employed in Corporate America—my (cis, straight) whitened male bosses were TOO Sincere. These were SO SCARED to criticize individuals who did not share their rights. Their overwhelming respect for all of us would be a real problem.To quote my friend Pam: *blink*[H/T to Shaker Brunocerous.]

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

In The News

[Content note: Misogyny, homophobia, racism]Power Up The Jam:Cindy McCain wants you to definitely take this totally great survey! (Sample question: "If the U . s . Condition develop a fence across the US/Mexico border to help keep illegal people from our country?")This can be a real factor on the planet: A singular in line with the small-series The Bible. Boston police went undercover on the web to prevent the city's most dreaded scourge: DIY indie-rock shows. Hilarity unsued.They Hate Us For The Freedom, North Korean Edition.Mind: BLOWN! Shapeshifting aliens are working for the key Service! Misogyny is great!The Best essentially shit their pants when Sunday's Google doodle featured Cesar Chavez.

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

There Goes My Newshole!

[Content note: transphobia]The Hill :The and Human Services Department stated early Friday it would accept public comments on whether or not to reexamine its decision to not cover sex changes.But a representative stated Friday evening the proposal continues to be withdrawn. HHS drawn information from the website Friday after various press shops reported around the problem.Happy Good God Friday, bitchez!Just to provide you with a concept of how this went lower, browse the URL for your story: http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/medicare insurance/291063-hhs-board-to-consider-covering-sex-changes-under-medicare insurance-state medicaid programs [emphasis mine]Charlton Heston got twelve hrs on network TV. I acquired a report which i needed to tell its very own retraction.This leads me to a set of findings for that Federal government:Very first: I'm not sure if you have heard this before, but HOLY MOTHER OF REAGAN YOU ASSHOLES Are Actually BAD Only At That SHIT.I am talking about, I recieve it, I truly do. You will find individuals who get really pissed off whenever you collect taxes in exchange for social services. After your health care reforms, the Republicans made the decision that they are not likely to ever confirm all of your nominees to operate the Centers for State medicaid programs and Medicare insurance Services (Content management systems). Then there is the entire thought on whether religious institutions are needed to supply their employees with contraception, which clearly ended well for everybody involved.Still, HOW HARD Is That This SHIT?I am talking about, let us say you are considering making State medicaid programs and Medicare insurance trans*-inclusive. There is a couple of options:1) Just fucking get it done already. If anybody asks you questions, show them it's the 21st goddamned century.2) Open a public comment period to gather feedback on whether or not to revise the present prohibition on Content management systems funding for "transsexual surgery for sex reassignment of transsexuals." Despite the fact that it's most likely not essential to carry a listening period, why the hell not? Rock the election, etc..,If you are nervous that bigots can get all pissy and all of a sudden reiterate their objections for your existence, you could open discuss the Friday that begins a vacation weekend. If anybody questions you or else begins speaking shit, you may either ignore them (which makes them seem like assholes) or explain it's the 21st goddamned century (which makes them seem like a great deal larger assholes).3) Decide to not perform a fucking factor and go golf or whatthefuckever. Although this third strategy does not really help trans* people, it will provide you with the credibility of not searching such as the type of arrogant, from touch wankstain who uses trans* people as political pawns. Option 3 also does not rile in the birthers.Rather, you elected for that accidental trial balloon. WHAT. THE. FUCK. I, just, uh, how sloppy is it necessary to be? To be able to make that mistake, you'd need to either:a) Be so divorced from trans* individuals facts that you simply in some way did not understand that a public comment period could be somewhat questionable. Dude, before I checked, my whole fucking existence is questionable.b) Function as the type of "strong ally" who will get totally caught off-guard when someone inside your administration really stacks up for which you claim that they can have confidence in. (Talking about which, if the fiasco worked with cis individuals shit, this is one of the time I'd be prepared to hear an apology that might incorporate a firing and/or resignation. But whatever, it isn't much like your team totally flubbed the handling of the problem that affects real people. :cough:)I understand you will find those who are excited that you have an excellent secret intend to fix everything now that you have a behind-the-moments "administrative challenge", but um, when aren't trans* people challenging this shit?Shall We Be Held said to be excited that certain of the very most effective organizations in the us government might grant trans* people some use of some health care in exchange because of not being all embarrassing and public about this? Not necessarily. After I arrived on the scene, among the regional doctors that recommended the body's hormones only accomplished it around the agreement that patients who saw hir accomplished it under false pretenses. Fuck that. I am not embarrassed with my health care. Are you currently?And just what has Content management systems accomplished for me recently? Here are a few things they may try:1) A guide that needs insurance coverage to become trans*-inclusive like a prerequisite of being a member of medical health insurance exchanges2) A guide that bars facilities that discrimination against trans* patients from receiving Content management systems funds.Second, perhaps you have fucking browse the determination in mind not in mind?Signs and Restrictions of Coverage Transsexual surgery for sex reassignment of transsexuals is questionable. Due to the possible lack of well controlled, long-term studies from the safety and effectiveness from the surgical treatments and attendant treatments for transsexualism, the therapy is recognized as experimental. Furthermore, there's maximum serious complications of these surgical treatments. Therefore, transsexual surgical treatment is not covered.Yeeeeeeah. Which was designed in 1981, the very first year of Reagan's presidency. Whether it's questionable to revisit the Reagan administration's positions on LGBT privileges and science, this appears nearly as good a period just like any, you realize?

Monday, April 1, 2013

Daily Dose of Cute

Zelda, just sitting alongside me around the couch like she's people.Of course, please feel welcome and urged to talk about pix from the fuzzy, feathered, or scaly people of ones own in comments.